These people should run Split-horizon DNS;
| Host | Wrong IP address | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 5696908.renufunctionalwellness.com | 10.0.2.15 | RFC 1918 |
| 85.191.45.43.dynamic.dhcp.aura-net.dk | :: | IPv6 Unconfigured |
| 89-20-169-130.static.ef-service.nl | :: | IPv6 Unconfigured |
| antrax.virgos.com.br | 192.168.0.10 | RFC 1918 |
| creativeapps-ct.tdameritrade.com | 0.0.0.0 | Unconfigured |
| dyn018216.shef.ac.uk | 172.16.18.216 | RFC 1918 |
| imap0.officemail.fi001.nl.intern.freedomnet.nl | 10.1.1.115 | RFC 1918 |
| ns1.netplus.co.in | 64:ff9b::6729:17c2 | RFC 6052 |
| ns2.netplus.co.in | 64:ff9b::6729:17c3 | RFC 6052 |
| ns4.tataidc.co.in | 64:ff9b::6708:2e05 | RFC 6052 |
| resolv-ixc-2.hoztnode.net | 172.31.112.230 | RFC 1918 |
| srv1.unicollege.net | 192.168.10.1 | RFC 1918 |
Last update: Wed 8 Feb 07:02:02 UTC 2023
You can block answers like these with Bind's 'deny-answer-addresses' feature;
deny-answer-addresses {
// Unconfigured
0.0.0.0;
// RFC 1918
10.0.0.0/8;
172.16.0.0/12;
192.168.0.0/16;
// RFC 3927
169.254.0.0/16;
// IPv6
// :: to ::ffff:ffff:ffff.
// Includes ::, ::1, IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresses ::/96,
// and IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses ::ffff:0:0/96
::/80;
// RFC 6052
64:ff9b::/96;
// Reserved for Documentation
2001:db8::/32;
// IPv6 Unique Local
fc00::/7;
// IPv6 Link local
fe80::/10;
// IPv6 Site local
fec0::/10;
// Your IPv6 address range(s)
Net/Mask
} except-from { "Your.Domain"; };
deny-answer-aliases { "Your.Domain"; };
The produces log entries like;
Aug 21 19:31:01 sput named[1601]: answer address 10.0.0.100 denied for spacefon.com/A/IN
Not blocking these addresses can be a serious security risk.